Gathered into One Loaf
Hespeler, 2 October, 2016 © Scott
McAndless – World Communion
1 Corinthians 10:14-22, Luke
14:15-24 , Psalm 104:1-15
Y
|
ou are all familiar enough with
the gospels and the letters and other writings that make up what we call the
New Testament. This little collection of books is the most important source
that we have for understanding the early Christians and how they worked out
their life and faith together. This morning I would like to introduce you to one
other document that you really ought to know about. It is called the Teaching
of the Twelve and also goes by the name of The
Didache, which is the Greek word for teaching.
The Didache is
a very old document – some scholars think that parts of it may well be older
than parts of the New Testament. It is also a very important document for a few
reasons. It may well contain genuine traditions that go all the way back to the
very words of Jesus – traditions that are independent of the gospels. It
contains, for example, a version of the Lord’s Prayer that is slightly
different from the one that is found in the Gospel of Matthew and from the one
that is in the Gospel of Luke. It seems likely that the writers of the Didache
did not get their version of The Lord’s Prayer from the Gospels but from an
independent tradition passed down to them from some other source – ultimately from
Jesus himself.
But the book
actually gives us more than just insights into the original wording of Jesus’
prayer. It also gives us a glance into the worship practices of the early
church. In fact, a great deal of the book is clearly focussed directly on the
worship and other customs of a certain group of churches in a certain area.
Most of the scholars I have read seem
to believe that they were made up of second or third generation Christians in
Galilee or in nearby Syria.
I find this
fascinating because it gives us what is perhaps the very first glimpse we have
(outside of the Bible and not influenced by any of the Biblical writings) of
how the first church actually lived and worshipped. In other words, if you want
to know what the earliest Christians actually thought they were accomplishing
when they ate communion or performed a baptism, the Didache may be one of the
very best sources that we have.
The Didache
has, for example, a prayer of thanksgiving that was to be prayed whenever the
community gathered to eat what we would call the Lord’s Supper or Communion or
the Eucharist, but which they seemed to call simply the Thanksgiving Meal. As
these prayers are probably the oldest communion prayers in existence (and they
are nice and brief) I have decided to use them as our communion prayers this
morning. I think they can teach us a lot about what they thought about
communion that might challenge how we think about it today.
You see, when
we gather to celebrate communion, there are certain things that we say about
what we are doing and there are certain images that we use. We usually say, for
example, that this meal is about the death of Jesus. In particular, we
associate the bread with the broken body of Jesus and the wine with the spilt
blood of Jesus. The imagery we often use is the imagery of a sacrifice or an
atoning death. And we also look forward to the return, someday of Christ.
I don’t know
how much you pay attention to the prayers that you have heard ministers like me
praying before communion services but, if you do, those are the kinds of images
that we you’ll hear us use over and over again because that is what we believe
that communion is about – remembering and re-enacting those things.
But if you listen
to the prayers that I use today from the Didache, you will not hear any of that
imagery. The prayers of those ancient Galilean or Syrian Christians speak of
Jesus Christ and talk about how he reveals God to us, of course, but they do
not make any reference to his death at all. There is absolutely no talk of
sacrifice or atonement nor even any reference to the return of Christ.
Now, I am not
suggesting that the Christian churches of the Didache community did not believe
these things about Jesus and his death. Of course they did and there are
references in other parts of the book to these truths. And they may well even
have believed that the Thanksgiving Feasts that they shared had important
connections to the meaning of the death of Jesus (though there is some evidence
to suggest that this particular connection may have first been made by the
Apostle Paul). You certainly cannot prove that they didn’t believe something
just because they didn’t mention it in this very important prayer.
But it does
suggest something. It does suggest that, when they gathered to eat this meal,
they did put the emphasis in some rather different places than where we put it
when we gather. And maybe we can learn something from the imagery that they
used when they ate this meal.
There were two
prayers that they prayed. The first one was over the cup and they prayed, “We thank You, our Father, For the Holy Vine
of David Your servant, Whom You made known to us through Your Servant Jesus;
May the glory be Yours forever.” That was it. The prayer is based on the
image of the making of wine itself which begins with the vine and the grapes
that grow upon it. For the Didache Christians the wine (and the vine that it
grew on) was a symbol of their connection with their hope. It connected them with
the promises made to King David of a kingdom that would last forever – promises
that they believed had been fulfilled in Jesus the Messiah and the son of
David. That symbolism of the connecting vine is not one that we generally use
when we take the cup but it is one that I think we might learn from.
But I am
particularly interested today (on this World Communion Sunday) in the prayer
that they prayed over the loaf: “We thank You, our Father, For the life and
knowledge Which You made known to us through Your Servant Jesus; May the glory
be Yours forever. As this broken bread was scattered over the mountains, And
was gathered together to become one, So let Your Church be gathered together
From the ends of the earth into Your kingdom; for the glory and power are Yours
through Jesus Christ forever.”
For them, the
bread seemed to point to two things. First of all, it spoke to them of
everything that they had learned and seen in the life and teachings of Jesus.
There is no direct reference to his death (which is where we put the emphasis)
but rather the focus seems to be on his life.
The second
focus of their prayer, however, is on an image – the image of the creation of
the loaf itself. They notice that the loaf began its life spread over the
mountains. This is actually one of the things that indicates to us that the
Didache may have had its origins in Galilee. The best place to grow grain in
Galilee was in the hill country and many of the hills were called mountains. So
this prayer evokes the image of the grain growing on the mountaintops, being
harvested and ground and then baked together into one loaf.
Why is this
important? Because it suggests to us what it actually meant to these earliest
Christians when they gathered and shared this kind of meal together. It was not
primarily, for them, a feast of the dead and resurrected Christ. I mean, yes,
they believed in the importance of the death of Jesus and the truth of his
resurrection, but when they ate this meal that was not the first thing that
came to mind. The image of the grain harvested from many hilltops and then
baked into one loaf was, for them, what it all came down to.
It was a
feast, first and foremost, of the unity of the church. I believe that that was
at the very foundation of the feast. Even the Apostle Paul – who may have been
the first one to make the connection between communion and the death of Christ
– tells us that, before anything else, it is about our unity with one another.
Since the authentic letters of Paul are actually the first written books of the
New Testament (they were almost certainly written before any of the gospels),
Paul was the first person to give us a written account of the Last Supper and
to say what it meant. Yes, he said that he received that account from others
who had told it to him, but he was the first one to set it down in a form that
endured. So he was the one who first told us, in the eleventh chapter of the
first letter to the Corinthians, that Jesus said that the meaning of the bread
was, “This is my body that is for you.
Do this in remembrance of me.”
But before Paul ever told us that, he
told us in the tenth chapter of the same letter, “Because there is one
bread, we who are many are one body, for we all partake of the one bread.”
So even before Paul proclaimed that the bread was the body of Christ, he also
declared that the loaf was the body of the church and that eating it together
was a sign of our unity. He knew that the unity came first. The experience of
the resurrection was the centrepiece of Christian faith, but Paul knew that he
believers would never experience the power of the resurrection until they had
found unity with one another.
What that
means, my sisters and my brothers, is this: this feast is the feast of the
resurrected Christ. When we eat this bread and drink this cup we do proclaim
the death of Christ until he comes. It is also true that, when we eat and drink
this sacred meal, the risen Jesus has promised to be present with us in it – truly
present. But here is the problem: none of us can know that and none of us can
experience that until we are united in one body as a church. Unity comes first.
So before this
bread is broken like this body of Jesus was broken on the cross, you need to
understand something about it. Before this bread becomes, for us, the body of
Christ, it has to become the body of the church. You are the church – all of
you. You make the church not because you are all the same but precisely because
you are all so different.
We are those
grains who start out spread far and wide over the mountaintops. We all sprouted
where we were. We all grew into faith in our own way because of our unique
circumstances and experiences. Some of you brought wounds and hurts into the
life of the church. Some of you brought strengths and wonderful gifts. Most of
us brought a mixture of both the positives and negatives. We came as we were
and we remain as we are.
But though we
started out in life spread far and wide over the hills and dales, we are all
ground together into one bag of flour and then we have all been baked into one
loaf. All of us come from different backgrounds and life experiences and here
we have come together to be one. As you can imagine, that naturally leads to
problems and clashes. We sometimes fail to understand one another because we
are speaking out of our very different backgrounds and experiences and hurts. We
sometime fail to appreciate one another because we are all so different. But we
are only the church when we become that one loaf – when we finally realize that
our differences make us stronger and tastier. The diversity among us makes this
loaf delicious and full of good nutrients.
When we
finally realize that and embrace one another despite being all so different, we
are finally ready to experience the fullness of Christ among us. That kind of
unity doesn’t come naturally to us. We often have to work at valuing people for
who they are rather than for the things about them that are convenient to us.
We often have to work at listening and truly hearing one another. The promise
is that, when we do that, the presence of the risen Jesus will always be made
clear.
That is what
it means as we take this loaf, that was once spread far and wide over the
mountaintops but has now come together as one loaf and is become the church.
Only when we become that church, can the bread become the body of Christ who is
present with us when we break it.
#140CharacterSermon When we take #communion, we become united, despite
our differences, in 1 loaf so that 1 loaf can become Christ among us.
Comments
Post a Comment