Was Jesus an "atheist" because he taught that God is Spirit?
Hespeler, 15 May, 2016 © Scott
McAndless – Pentecost
John
4:7-24, Galatians 5:16-26, Acts
2:17-21
I
|
f you were to ask me the question, “Do you believe
in God? I would answer that
question without a moment of hesitation: “Do I believe in God? Yes, of course I believe in
God.” In fact, that is kind of the obvious answer for someone in my position to
give. It is an answer so obvious that, in general, nobody would even bother to
ask the question.
In fact, being a
Christian is one of the things that offers me continual assurance that, yes,
there is a God because, you know, sometimes I look around at the world and I
see everything that goes wrong and it does make me wonder. When I do
start to wonder like that, the thing that often reassures me that there is a
God who exists and cares is what I have heard and learned from Jesus.
That is why I was
surprised to learn recently that one of the really big problems that ancient
pagans had with Christians back in the bad old days of the Roman Empire was
that they considered us to be atheists.
I mean, you could
say a lot of bad things about Christians. We have our flaws and shortcomings
and failures. But not
believing in God? I wouldn’t call that one of them.
So I’ve thought about that accusation over
the last little while. I’ve thought about it a lot. Why would pagan Romans
accuse Christians of being atheists? And I get, of course, that the pagans were
a bit upset that the Christians wouldn’t acknowledge the existence of their gods. But this was about more than
just a question of Christians refusing to recognize Jupiter or Mars or Mercury.
To tell the truth, the traditional Roman religions had been on the decline for
years before the Christians ever showed up on the scene.
No, this wasn’t just about protecting the
status or worship of any particular gods. This was about the Christians
challenging the very concept of divinity that the Greco-Roman world had. The
problem was that the Christians were a-theists.
The problem was that they did not believe in theos, which was the Greek word for the concept of divinity.
And, you know what, in that sense, I think
that the critics of Christianity may have been right. Starting with the very
words of Jesus and continuing through the life of the early church, the
Christians had ways of talking about and interacting with God that totally blew
that Greek concept away. If you listened – I mean really listened – to Jesus
and his disciples you simply would not have been able to conceive of God in the
same way again.
Think, for example, of the way that Jesus
speaks of God in our reading this morning from the Gospel of John. Jesus is
engaged in a conversation with a Samaritan woman about matters of religion.
Jesus has just said something to her that has made her realize that she is not
just talking to an ordinary person – that he can somehow speak for God. And her
immediate response is to ask him a religious question: “Our ancestors worshiped on this
mountain, but [Jews like] you say that the place where people must worship is
in Jerusalem.”
The question she is asking is a theistic
question. It is the kind of question that Romans might ask about their gods.
Where is the best place to worship Jupiter, they might ask. The name of the god
might be different but the concern is exactly the same. There are all kinds of
assumptions behind a question like that. She is assuming that God requires a
certain sort of worship from us. She is assuming that place matters when it
comes to such worship. Even more important, she is assuming that worship,
properly done in proper places, will influence God to act in certain ways.
And everyone in that world at that time
would have expected Jesus to jump into that argument and explain to the woman
exactly why it was right and good to worship God only in a particular place – in
the temple in Jerusalem. Because if anybody in that world knew anything about
gods (and this includes both Jews and Gentiles) they knew that it was vastly
important that you access those gods in the right ways and in the right places.
But, while Jesus does acknowledge
that, historically speaking, Jerusalem is the place for accessing God, he also
says that that is no longer true now. In fact, he announces a brand new insight
into the nature of God: “God is spirit,” he says, “and those who worship him must worship in spirit and
truth.” And there, right there, you have one good explanation for why
people accused Jesus’ followers of being atheists.
You see, the whole development of
religion is one of the ways in humans have always dealt with the basic fears
that come with life in this very unpredictable world. I mean, who can stand
going through this world and just not knowing what terrible thing might happen
next? Sickness and disease, war and pestilence, accidents and all kinds of
other terrible things that can go wrong seem to shadow our every moment of
existence as human beings on this planet. And, most terrifying of all, so much
of it seems to happen for no apparent reason.
And so people
looked to their gods to explain these things and especially to find a way to
control all of the terrible and frightening things that seem to happen in this
world. Religion developed as a way to control the things that happen to us by
controlling the gods who make these things happen. Holy sites were chosen,
temples were built and priests are consecrated to manage all of the ways that
the gods were manipulated with rituals and sacrifices to influence them and make
things happen in certain ways. I think that this is true of any religion
including Judaism and even Christianity in many of its forms.
But when Jesus
declared that it didn’t really matter where you worship God – whether in
Jerusalem or Samaria – because God was spirit, he was really declaring but he
didn’t believe in that kind of God – the kind of God who could be manipulated
with our religion.
And, it must be
said, that this was a very dangerous thing for him to say because what was at
stake was not only the question of where one might worship God. Religion, in
all of its forms, has built up these complex power structures over the
centuries. If the priests and religious leaders are able to manipulate the gods
and so control the terrible things that may happen in this world, then they are
extraordinarily powerful and they can use that power as leverage in other areas
of life. That’s how religion becomes a powerful tool for manipulating whole
populations and for amassing great wealth, which is what it has been for much
of human history.
But Jesus, with
one short phrase, “God is Spirit,”
throws all of that carefully developed power structure to the wind. And I
almost mean that literally. There was just one word – both in the Aramaic
language that Jesus spoke and in the Greek language of the gospel – one word
that was used to speak of both spirit and wind. Pneuma, in Greek, is a word that mean both spirit and wind. Ruach, in Hebrew also means both spirit
and wind. So when Jesus calls God spirit he is also calling God wind and, as
Jesus says elsewhere in this same gospel, “The
wind blows where it chooses, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know
where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the
Spirit.”
Jesus
was saying that, if God is spirit, then God is about as easy to nail down and
control as the wind. And I realize that we, as modern people do have a better
understanding of where the wind comes from and where it goes, than did the
people of Jesus’ time. We know about atmospheric pressures and air currents and
how they can influence and change the flows of the wind. But all our knowledge
has not brought us to the place where we can make it blow when, where and as
hard as we want it to. If we could do that, we would have shut down the fire in
Fort McMurray so easily, but we can’t. If the goal of our relgion is to bring God
under our control and get him to behave and make life play out as we want, we
will be sorely disappointed.
Religion has
always had one other goal other than the controlling of the gods. It has also
been very useful (especially for those who are most powerful in society) as a
way to control populations. Religion has been used to make people to behave in
certain ways, to make sure that they don’t ask for too much in the way of
change or reform. The fear of the gods and the promise of the religious power
structure to control the divine powers in this world has been used to impose
laws and standards of behaviour on people and to teach them that they must
tolerate the present structures of the world rather than to ask for change.
This power too is
destroyed by that one simple phrase, “God is spirit.” We see that in our
reading from the letter of Paul to the church in Galatia where Paul writes, “if you are led by the Spirit, you are not
subject to the law.” If God
is spirit then God is not outside of you telling you through laws and words and
scriptures how you ought to behave, God is within you prompting your behaviour
in quite unpredictable ways.
Now it must be said that the
Christian church has had a troubled history with that declaration of the
absolute freedom of believers that is proclaimed in passages like this one. The
church has sought to govern over the actions and even the thoughts of its
people through laws and rules and power structures, but the original declaraton
of your freedom remains there in the scriptures and so, I pray, it will never
be forgotten by God’s people.
So, with just
three words, “God is spirit,” Jesus really does do a lot to destroy the traditional
ways in which people have imagined God and how they have tended to work out
their relationshiop with God. It is, I believe, one reason why, in those early
centuries, people saw how the Christians lived and declared that they were
dangerous atheists – people who did not believe in God in the ways you were
supposed to believe in God.
Now, it is it is
important to note that Jesus, in saying such things, is not throwing us into
the chaos of a Godless world where anything could go wrong at any moment and
nothing has any meaning. Jesus does still believe in God, and the God that he
does believe in is clearly a God who is extraordinarily gracious and kind and
caring. It is a God who he speaks of, above all, as Abba – a word that we will
examine in more detail in several weeks. So clearly, it is not Jesus’ intention
to leave us with the impression that we are stuck going through life in a
dangerous universe where anything can go wrong and nothing ever makes any
sense. There is a God and we can trust that God is gracious. It is just that we
cannot expect to control that God through our religious practices. We do those
things for different reasons.
In the same way,
Paul insists, our freedom from the obligation to follow the law does not make
us immoral and dangerous people who will inevitably degenerate into the worse
excesses of behaviour. He insists that God, as spirit within us, prompts us to
the highest of impulses, “the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.”
So do not
be afraid of those three words, “God is spirit,” and where they will
lead us. But they definitely disturb the ways in which the world has learned to
think about God. I think it was one of the things that led to that anti-Christian
accusation of atheist. Though Jesus seems to have been clear on this matter, it
seems that the church has long struggled with such a view of God. It seems to
be easier to fall into the old ways of thinking about and relating to God. All
it seems to cost us is our freedom – our freedom from law and from fear.
Wouldn’t it be
awesome if we could just get so hung up on the radical ways in which Jesus
spoke about God that it would transform us? Wouldn’t it be amazing if the
outside world looked at us and said, “I’ve never seen a people who believed in
a God like that! Doesn’t remind me of any God I’ve ever heard of.” And then,
maybe, they would ask to learn more about the God that we worship.
#TodaysTweetableTruth #Jesus said God=Spirit, presenting view
of God so new it seemed atheistic. What if we had such a radical view of God?
Comments
Post a Comment